
Honestly, just look at any network puff piece featuring him, softball interview with him, or online
videos portraying his antics, and you’ll have to agree with us: Tim Walz’s public demeanor is nearly indistinguishable from the more familiar on-camera antics famously associated with PBS’s endlessly annoying purple theropod. Watch Walz cavort and mince while grinning more crazily than Indrid Cold, while waving his splayed fingers giddily and shouting inanities. The spectacle should be enough to convince anyone with even a garden-variety IQ, that an especially obnoxious beast is arisen, and he is prancing toward Bethlehem, or at least the District of Colombia. Let the horror wash over you, gentle readers.

School teacher turned mass-murdering Marxist, Pol Pot. Just look at those beady eyes!
Even liberals whom we long ago wrote off as hopelessly benighted, must at this turn of events acknowledge the blatant absurdity of the DNC’s latest affront to reality–the compounding of Dumb with Dumber, thus obliging their voters to support not only the DNC’s undemocratically anointed “Brat” presidential contender, but also to embrace, praise, and yes, even vote for, a vice-presidential pick whose comportment lends credence to the bizarre possibility that somehow, after being dead for a quarter of a century, Pol Pot has returned to wreck vengeance on America–but has by some feat of necromancy reincarnated in the image of Barney the Dinosaur; or at least some weirdly distorted avatar thereof, AKA, Tim Walz. Granted, Walz has never orchestrated the mass murder of Cambodians, or anyone else except the unborn, but Pol’s radicalism had the opportunity to fully blossom. Just give Walz a little time in office!
Too freakish?

“If you’re happy and you know it…”
If readers find themselves wondering why we at WOOF are driven to assert so freakish a composite of grotesqueries as Tim Walz, Pol Pot, and TV’s Barney, all rolled into one chubby Maoist, we advise that greater attention be paid to what a disaster Minnesota’s mimping Menshevik truly portends. We argue that Walz perfectly alloys the deceptive hugability of PBS’s sinistral lizard with the smiling sociopathy of the Cambodian mass murderer, neatly packaged within the media-friendly husk of an ultra-leftwing political hack, which is to say: Minnesota’s 41st governor. But you don’t need to see the commie dinosaur beneath the peppy facade to acknowledge the candidate’s radical baggage.
One man’s neighborliness is just another man’s Gulag…
Walz bounces to the podium followed by what National Review calls “a history of fabrication and radicalism” and NR is being nice. Consider: Governor Walz imposed mandatory Covid restrictions and a draconian clamp down on the uncompliant rivaling the harshest in the nation. He attempted to enforce his dictatorial decrees by establishing a “rat line” for use by comrade citizens eager to report neighbors or co-workers who weren’t following the Governor’s s mandates with sufficient alacrity. Apparently, when Walz compares socialism to “just being neighborly,” this is what he has in mind.

Obviously, in China, even wearing masks is often not enough!
Misstatements will happen…

Not a weapon of war.
Like Biden and Schumer, Walz loves to warn voters that Donald Trump intends to cancel Medicare and Social Security–though both assertions are nonsense. Walz also repeatedly misrepresents his military service–so much so that on August 22nd, 50 veterans from the House and Senate signed an open letter to him detailing the falsities with which he has ornamented his service record and stating flatly that when called to combat, Walz “turned his back on (his) troops.” Despite this fact, Walz emphasized recently that AR-15s should be banned because civilians should never be allowed to purchase or own “weapons of war that I carried in war,” a doubly false allusion given the fact that Walz never carried any weapon in war because he was never in one, besides which it suggests that the AR-15 is a combat weapon.
Bombarded with criticisms for suggesting he saw battle in Afghanistan, Walz (like Hillary Clinton after she was confronted with the falsity of her claim that she dodged sniper fire in Bosnia), explained the matter as a “misstatement.”

When landing under sniper fire, always remain composed!
Walz never bothered to explain his mischaracterization of the AR-15 as a weapon of war. In reality, nobody takes an AR-15 “to war.” It is a civilian semi-automatic version of the selective-fire M-16. Only the latter is comparable to the class of weapons Walz’s outfit really took to war, albeit without Walz.

Walz has a record of grinning triumphantly while CNN and sundry equally partisan media outlets praise him as “an Iraq and Afghanistan war veteran.” Obviously, it is bad form to permit such misstatements to slide by uncorrected, and while such an error might squeeze into an introduction once, and perhaps even twice, the misinformation crops up so repeatedly in Walz’s case it is difficult to suppose he is not its source.
But if Walz exaggerated his service record and his rank in the military, his career as a teacher is worrisomely simple to authenticate. As a high school teacher in the ’90s, Walz is recalled by his pupils as a virtual shill for the Red Chinese. His students remember him vividly as a teacher who never missed an opportunity to extol the glories of life under communism “where everyone is the same and everyone shares.” In November 1991 Walz taught pupils that under communism, “the doctor and the construction worker make the same salary. The Chinese government and the place they work for provide housing and…about 30 pounds of rice per month. They all get food and housing.”

“Hi! I’m your doctor, and I make the same salary as a construction worker–so you know you’re in good hands!”

Biden and Walz–the masked comrades.
According to the John Locke Foundation, “Walz’s remarks were reported in a 1991 article in Nebraska’s Alliance Times-Herald focusing on his work on student exchange programs in China. At the time, Walz was teaching social studies at a Nebraska high school. Certainly Walz makes no secret of his extensive travels in communist China. Like Biden, he is frequently on record asserting that China should not be viewed as an adversary.
“A moment I’ll never forget…”

A dark day in Nebraska..?
It merits mention that Walz made a special point of marrying his wife on the anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre. To deflect criticism in this regard, Walz routinely claimed he was in Hong Kong during the actual massacre, commiserating with distressed dissidents. He even offered vivid accounts of his communication with the outside world being cut off during the event. “I was just going to teach high school in Foshan [city], in Guangdong [province], and was in Hong Kong in May of ‘89,” Walz disinformed a congressional hearing in 2014, calling it “a moment I’ll never forget.” But Walz seems to have forgotten that he wasn’t there at all–he was in Nebraska at the time. Challenged on this point during the VP debate, Walz explained that he “misspoke.”
“A knucklehead at times…”
“I got my dates wrong,” he added, explaining that he could be “a knucklehead
at times…I make mistakes like everybody else.” Right? Recalling sweating out the bloodbath in Tiananmen Square hunkered down in Hong Kong with terrified dissidents when one was actually kicking back in cozy Nebraska is the kind of mistake that any knucklehead could make.

Comrade Rukavina
And because we at WOOF are not ones to shy away from assigning guilt by association (when it suits us) let’s add here that Fox News scanned the Facebook account of Ida Rukavina, whom Governor Walz appointed commissioner of Minnesota’s Department of Iron Range Resources and Rehabilitation, and discovered a photo of Rukavina’s dog, behind whom one plainly espies the exhibited portraits of two well-known communist mass murderers, namely Mao Tse-Tung, and Che Guevara. WOOF, by the way, believes that the dog is a good American. Rukavina is the subversive who hung the nauseous fan pics.

An unwitting handmaiden!

Honest Rod
National Review’s Jim Geraghty called the idea of a Walz vice-presidency “laughable,” pointing out with classic NR acerbity that as a VP nominee Walz would “combine the honesty of former Illinois governor Rod Blagojevich, the competence of former Louisiana governor Kathleen Blanco, and the sharp-eyed ethical-watchdog instincts of soon-to-be-former New Jersey senator Bob Menendez.” And one could argue that Geraghty was just being polite. What he neglected to say was that with enough media support, such a toxic combination of deficits can be successfully peddled to the American electorate.
No Josh?

The DNC’s newest constituents.
Not that media were initially geared to delude the public about Walz. Rather, the lamestream was poised to sell Pennsylvania governor Josh Shapiro to hapless Democrat and undecided voters, and Harris signaled his lock om the nomination so powerfully that his selection seemed inevitable. Obviously Shapiro might have helped Pennsylvania remain blue, but some last-second strategizing in Kamala’s camp produced the realization that (oops!) Shapiro is Jewish and even worse, maintains strong ties to Israel. In a Democrat party with a thriving and vocal pro-Hamas faction, a Jewish vice-presidential candidate was simply out of the question. Belatedly, someone explained this to a previously-oblivious Harris, who promptly jerked the rug from under Shapiro’s feet and opted for the man they call “Tampon Tim”–a cognomen Walz earned when he–in his eminent wokeness–moved to install tampon dispensers in boys bathrooms throughout Minnesota’s public schools.

With Shapiro in happier days...
An untimely wet blanket…

Acidic Rob Port
But in their haste to dispose of the Jewish guy, Kamala’s handlers barely looked at Walz’s lurking backlog of accusations, suspicions, and yes, even FBI investigations, mainly related to Walz’s antics while governor of Minnesota. Journalist Rob Port is among many who pointed to “a veritable supermarket of problematic anecdotes from [Walz’s] time as Minnesota’s governor that could be an untimely wet blanket when Democrats need a bonfire of enthusiasm.”
So, given the menacing possibility that Walz may
become the first reincarnation of Pol Pot (reconfigured as a Barney the Dinosaur) to be duly elected (or, just as probably, unduly imposed) as America’s next Vice President, shouldn’t somebody say something? Besides us, that is?
Okay, so as of September 30th, the House Committee on Oversight issued a subpoena to Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas for intelligence reports, documents, and communications in its possession related to Governor Timothy Walz’s connections to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Photos of the cadaverous Mayorkas yawning in response are not immediately available.

By now, the Oversight Committee must realize that no matter what it discovers, the media are ready and willing to steadfastly ignore.
According to recently received whistleblower disclosures, there exists considerable non-classified evidence of Governor Walz’s connections to the CCP. Chairman James Comey added that “The Committee has also learned that further relevant information regarding Governor Walz has been memorialized in both classified and unclassified documents in the control of DHS.” But don’t anyone get excited! The American media have performed brilliantly in their organized dismissal of anything Comey’s committee discovers.

Don’t be surprised by “joy!”

OMG, He’s a freaking lizard!!
The Association of Mature American Citizens takes a more sanguine view, writing that “After a few days of exuberance in the Democrats’ radical and populist base and an avalanche of hype from their sympathetic establishment media, the sober reality of Kamala Harris’s choice of vice presidential running mate has already begun to sink in.” Sadly, WOOF believes the pop imagery of Barney, dancing, hugging and spreading–well–you know…joy…is receiving much broader distribution than the truer perception of Pol Pot’s bloody wraith cavorting inside the clownish facade of the superficially lovable lizard.

Author Greenbaum.
So as you go the polls this November, fellow citizens, think of a prophetic ditty about a monstrous eggplant written by Norman Greenbaum…but consider this lyrical addition from your friends in the WOOF cave:
You’d better watch out for the dinosaur that ate Minnesota… cuz if we can’t stop him, the whole country’s doomed!




control of the White House are Nazis, than to identify them as antisemitic neo-liberals. Overtly-antisemitic rhetoric has been supplanted in Biden’s era by a new set of equally venomous, though superficially benign, talking points. In his inimitably shallow style, Biden has managed to disguise his effort to discomfit Israel as altruism– even humanitarianism. His ardent allies in doing so are Hamas, academe, and the mainstream media.
Just as Biden’s efforts to steer the American Republic onto the terminal shoals of Cloward-Piven are dissembled by allusions to such focus-group favorites as net-zero energy, women’s reproductive rights, and that wonderfully oxymoronic Dadaism: “Bidenomics”–so our Poseur in Chief contrives to abandon our staunchest ally in the Middle East to the ravages of terrorism–all the while burbling niceties about restraint, diplomatic solutions, and the now laughable fiction of “returning to a two state solution.”


Thus we ask: with friends like these, who needs Hitler–and who needs to indulge in reductio ad Hitlerum? The heathen adversaries 0f freedom are occupying our ivy-league campuses, closing down our domestic arteries of trade and transportation, rioting in our halls of governance, and diverting hundreds of police officers from their routine duties in order to cart off snarling suburban college kids (and their salaried accomplices) who when interviewed can rarely articulate their grievances, or explain why they are chanting slogans promoting the destruction of the Jewish state. Yet, even as Israel battles f0r survival in the Holy Land, Blinken and Biden mouth daily assurances of America’s iron-clad determination to defend Israel despite doing nothing whatsoever to discourage the radicals, and everything within their power to stymie the Israelis.
It may be lost on the muppets masquerading as journalists in our “mainstream” media, but Israel is in mortal peril. It must defend itself not only against the bestial attackers of October 7th, but against powers determined to annihilate it as a nation. It is our national embarrassment that Biden’s government, while happy to offer pretenses of sympathy, is, like Biden’s mentor Obama, profoundly hostile to Zion.
concerned–indeed, one might make bold to say, of Christendom itself– our enemies in the region openly deem the erasure of Israel a necessary prerequisite. Israel viewed in this context is the proverbial canary in the mine shaft. If Israel is eradicated, which is the sole outcome acceptable to its opponents, their attention will be freed to focus entirely on the destruction of America. It would require a preternaturally obtuse troglodyte at this point in history to miss the fact that to the mullahs of Iran, and the vast armies of maniacal butchers they train, finance, and deploy, the long-standing initial goal is the total destruction of the “Little Satin,” i.e., the state of Israel, after which, the greater goal is to overwhelm and annihilate the “Big Satin”–a sort of Luciferian grand finale resulting in the collapse of the United States. 










How an American president who cannot bolster the public’s plunging opinion of his own abysmal performance in office proposed to prevent “the whole world’s public opinion” from shifting vis-a-vis Israel, was not specified, besides which, plenty of world opinion is antiemetic to begin with. But of course, Biden was predicting the inevitable backlash Israel always encounters the moment it goes on the offensive. Far from harboring any inclination to confront it, Biden was already helping to engineer it.
Within a few weeks, even The New Yorker figured this out, noting that Biden was already “calling the [Israeli] offensive ‘over the top’ and the bombing ‘indiscriminate.’” A few days later he thought it appropriate to joke about his disagreements with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, stressing that he once told the Israeli leader: “I love you, but I don’t agree with a damn thing you have to say,” coyly adding “It’s about the same today.” For its part, the Associated Press affected surprise, writing that “Biden’s order is a rare step against America’s closest ally in the Mideast who, Biden says, has the right to defend itself. But the Democratic president has pressed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government to show greater restraint in its military operations aimed at rooting out Hamas.”

What’s important now, rather obviously, is the new year of 2024, and the unfortunate fact that more Americans are facing more potential danger than at any point since the Cuban missile crisis, though for a far more varied set of reasons. And the multiplicity of threats merely amplifies the level of danger. 





s–weapons intended to attack other satellites (meaning ours) while “Little Rocket Man” (aka Kim Jong Un) has returned to his former habit of lobbing nuke-capable missiles in various directions, notably Japan’s. This proceeds as the United States sells Israel out to the jackals at the United Nations, and the Democrats blame House Republicans for the result.
While the Washington Post and the New York Times busied themselves ranting that concerns about this undocumented floodtide symbolized “right-wing paranoia,” retired Yuma Border Patrol chief Chris Clem remarked, “What you’re seeing…is military-age, single, adult males. We just had about eight Syrian nationals come across. There’s people from all over the world showing up here.”
It would be wonderful to be wrong about this, but it seems inevitable that at some point a switch will be thrown in Beijing, or Tehran, and trained, fanatical terrorists will be activated throughout our country. Whether the architects of this potentiality will pull the trigger before Biden’s re-election effort, or in the wake of its likely failure, remains conjecturable–but its inevitability is difficult to challenge. One way or another it will play an important role in the year of living dangerously.
planet is a tinder box. 


On January 17th no less an authority than Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director-General of the World Health Organization, lectured Davos attendees on “Preparing for Disease X.” Apparently, this hypothetical disease may have the unpleasant attribute of proving approximately 100-percent lethal, thus requiring truly draconic strictures in preparation for its arrival, to say nothing of the universal government response requisite to managing its devastating effects once it (hypothetically) manifests itself. 
Let’s take this moment–why not?–to expand our concerns about nuclear warfare beyond the mere possibility that Putin may do something jiggy, or that Kim Jung Un may nuke himself in the foot, and focus instead on some full-blown, grade “A” homicidal maniacs–the Iranian leadership. Confronted with the mullahs’ outspoken and unequivocal lust to develop their own nuclear weapon with which to expunge Israel, the Biden administration has responded by showering Tehran with every extra few billion it can lay hands on. Meanwhile Washington has ensured that all restrictions on Iranian trade and finance be removed so that their nuclear program can advance unhindered. According to Reuters, Iran will have produced fissile material sufficient to make its first bomb by the time you read this. We realize, CNN, MSNBC, and the “legacy” networks have not deemed this news so vital as to bother viewers with it, nor preempted their dogged rationalizations of, say, Judge Engoron’s grinning buffoonery, or the burlesque surrounding Fani Willis, long enough to mention it. We suggest skeptical readers seek verification by 

Rome, Mortal Republic, and took pains to instruct Americans that the collapse of Rome “offers a chilling lesson to modern Americans.” As the New York Times recently reminded its remaining readers: “Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar has always been about more than killing Julius Caesar.” Last March, the website Fabius Maximus, published a ditty headlined “America isn’t falling like the Roman Empire. It’s worse.” As if by way of chorusing the sentiment, New York magazine offered up the self-infatuated Andrew Sullivan whose essay claimed “our Founding Fathers were particularly concerned with Rome’s fall from republic to autocracy.”





















